Who’s the selfish?
On november 2007 I had the chance to tape Bjork’s peformance in Lima, Peru. Because taping is not a common thing in my country, I thought it was time to renew my recording equipment (an old Sony tape recording) to capture such a great event. After following crowbi_wan’s advice, I opted for buying a nice iRiver iHP 120, which costed me around US$200. I’ve also got some nice mics on it (Sony), however, recently I’ve bought a better ones, after following the recommendations from losflower4 at the Technical Stuff section from Curefans.com
Well, the thing is that I managed to record the whole Bjork concert and published it in Dimeadozen, a very known site for sharing loseless unofficial recordings. People was very happy because, despite Peru is holding many concerts lately, there are not that many recordings shared on the Internet. As I said before, taping is not a common thing in my country.
Unfortunately, after my recording was shared, despite the clear indication of not converting it to a lossy format (mp3 and similars), and not to re-publish the show in such format, some people decided that they have the right over the recording and converted it to mp3, uploaded it in sites like rapidshare, and even changed my name from David to Daniel!
Actually, I’ve found my recording on a blog (which is not even worth to mention) where the owner decided to cut part of the “info.txt” file we use to put together with the recording. In this file you can find information as the setlist, the equipment used, some notes about the concert and some indications. It looks like he decided that my wishes about “not converting the recording to mp3 or other lossy format” where not important, and thus, deleted that part of the file. How nice!
Of course, he wrote in his post “thank you so much for the recording”, but actually didn’t give a shit about respecting a simple wish. When I wrote a comment complaining of why he did that, he decided not to publish it, but instead send me an e-mail that shows just how people does not give a shit about other’s work and discourage the sharing-spirit of many Tapers in the world. Let’s read his letter:
“….Yes, I actually deleted the fragment of your message, and it was me who posted the mp3 links even when you said that you did not want that. It would have been very easy for me not to even mention your name, but I’ve decided that I should thank you in public and give you the credits…”
This grabber not only decided how he wants to “thanks me”. He also writes like I should be grateful that he’s publishing my name. What a prick! But here’s more:
“Your idea to keep the original recording (…) is not universal and does not apply once you publish the content on the Internet… (…) where, as you know, the idea is to share for free and to as many people as possible. Unfortunately, not everyone has the technical facilities to reproduce FLAC files and even worst, to keep them on their PCs, and because of that, and considering the purpose of my Blog (and all the download-blogs of the Internet), which is to share music (he didn’t mention here that he does not care about sharing copyright material) for everyone, I published the concert as mp3 and I will do it again if given the chance”
Does this guy lives in the 90’s? Not technical facilities? Everyday we have more fast access to the Internet, and everyday we see how we the storage hard-disk are increase. Not even mention the Blu-ray technology, which soon is going to replace the DVD. The Blu-ray is able to hold 50GB, almost 10 times the current DVD.
Problems playing FLAC files? Looks like this guy also does not know that the last version of Winamp, the most popular media player in the world, already support FLAC.
Now, why the tapers want to preserver the original recording?. It’s very simple: they want to preserve the original record for the future. They want other generations to enjoy the recording as it was captured in the moment.
When something is converted to mp3, there’s no return (the audio LOSE quality). But the worst thing here is that maybe some people find the mp3 recording, and make their own “remaster” and upload a second mp3 version, which, as you can imagine, it’s even worse.
Now, the guy goes on my nerves:
“Maybe you think you have certain rights over the files, but not. It’s a bootleg and it will stay like this always. In any case the only one who have an ownership over the recording is Bjork. I really thank you for the effort, but once more, the Internet is for everyone and not just for a group of fanatics. I’m sorry I passed your recording as mp3, but I guess you will understand it if you really wanted to keep something beautiful thinking on the rest of the people and not thinking in a kind of fame or for personal money”
Because of the freedom of the Internet, and the sharing-spirit, many Tapers, unlike in the past, are publishing their recordings. Because of the Tapers we can enjoy that old Cure recording of 1986 in Dax, for example. Or the great Hamburg 2002 gig.
When I put the recording on Dime, It was clear my intenttion to share it with all the world. I wanted to give back a bit of what I took. Now, why is so hard for some people to understand just certain wishes? This guy would have one less post in his Blog if I just decided not to share the Bjork recording. He couldn’t even comment about it. Because of people like this, Tapers who want to be friendly, just have to turn selfish sometimes.
“(…) Nex time, if you want just you or a group of people listen your recording, write it exactly and with password and shared it just among your friend. It does not make sense to publish in public forums. And by the way, I inform you I won’t publish your comment on my blog. There’s enough selfish people in the streets to give them also space in my Blog”
This is the funniest part. Who’s the selfish here? The Taper who share his recording with a simple indication, or the Blogger who decided what to do with that recording, the Blogger who decided to credit or not, to cut some info or not, to publish a reply or not?
Well, what is for sure is that definitely I will have to think twice before sharing something in the future.



